In partnership with

Welcome back to Beyond Deadlines newsletter—a free perk for people looking to improve in Planning and Scheduling. Each week, we provide tactics, prompts, jobs and food for thought. We want you to succeed today, tomorrow and throughout the rest of your career.

I wasn’t a victim; I made my own choices how to respond. You don’t always control your circumstances, but you can always control your response.

Call Sign Chaos by Jim Mattis

The Future of Shopping? AI + Actual Humans.

AI has changed how consumers shop by speeding up research. But one thing hasn’t changed: shoppers still trust people more than AI.

Levanta’s new Affiliate 3.0 Consumer Report reveals a major shift in how shoppers blend AI tools with human influence. Consumers use AI to explore options, but when it comes time to buy, they still turn to creators, communities, and real experiences to validate their decisions.

The data shows:

  • Only 10% of shoppers buy through AI-recommended links

  • 87% discover products through creators, blogs, or communities they trust

  • Human sources like reviews and creators rank higher in trust than AI recommendations

The most effective brands are combining AI discovery with authentic human influence to drive measurable conversions.

Affiliate marketing isn’t being replaced by AI, it’s being amplified by it.

Your program schedules are bleeding inconsistencies.

And it's killing your ability to make smart decisions.

When one project uses calendars differently than another, when activity codes don't match across teams, when your WBS structures look like they were built by five different people, you're not managing a program. You're herding cats.

Here's what actually works to lock down consistency across multiple projects in P6.

Set Standards at the EPS Level

This is where real consistency starts. Not with policies. With structure.

Set your program defaults at the Enterprise Project Structure level. Calendars, activity settings, coding frameworks. Make them cascade down so every project inherits the same DNA. It's not sexy, but it works.

Use Codes Like You Mean It

Global codes and project codes aren't optional. They're how you enforce a consistent framework for classifying work, tracking progress, and rolling up deliverables.

Without them, your program dashboards become useless decoration.

With them, every project speaks the same language.

Standardize Your WBS and Naming

This one's simple but nobody does it.

Create a standard WBS template. Define naming rules. Write them down. Then enforce them.

When every project follows the same structure, comparing scope, analyzing progress, and tracking dependencies becomes possible instead of painful.

Control Your Calendars and Resources

Maintain shared calendars and resource definitions at the program level.

Otherwise, you'll have projects using different working time assumptions, different resource availability, different productivity rates. And suddenly you're comparing apples to hand grenades.

Leverage Baselines and Reflection Projects

Baseline standards ensure you're measuring performance the same way across every project.

Reflection projects let you run what if scenarios without touching live schedules.

Both give you the ability to evaluate without destroying your data.

Enforce It Through Governance

Standards without enforcement are suggestions.

Run routine schedule audits. Use checklist driven validations. Build governance rules that keep projects aligned throughout their lifecycle, not just at kickoff.

Consistency isn't a one time setup. It's a discipline.

When you build it into your program structure, you stop fighting fires and start managing outcomes.

Create A Proposal to Improve Consistancy

Copy and paste this prompt into ChatGPT, Gemini or Claude.

Act like a senior construction scheduler and program controls specialist.

Your goal is to create a customized business proposal to implement program-wide schedule consistency using Primavera P6 enterprise capabilities for a specific construction organization.

Task:

1) First, ask focused discovery questions.

2) Then, use the answers to write a tailored proposal.

Step 1 – Ask these discovery questions (number your questions):

About the organization

  1. What is your company name and primary construction focus (vertical, infrastructure, data centers, industrial, other)?

  2. What is the approximate total value of your current program portfolio?

  3. How many active projects are in your program?

  4. What scheduling tools are used today (P6, MS Project, others)?

    About the Current Pain Points

  5. What are the biggest schedule inconsistency problems (resources, reporting, decision delays, etc.)?

  6. Describe one recent incident where inconsistency cost time or money.

  7. How do calendars, activity codes, and WBS structures differ across projects?

  8. How long does it take to produce a reliable program-level report now?

    About the Audience

  9. Who will read this proposal (titles and key concerns)?

  10. What is their P6/scheduling knowledge level (executive, intermediate, expert)?

  11. What objections or concerns do you expect?

    About Resources, Constraints, and Success

  12. How many schedulers do you have?

  13. Do you have a P6 administrator or enterprise owner?

  14. What budget range and timeline are realistic?

  15. What standards or requirements matter (DCMA-14, client specs, internal policies)?

  16. How will you measure success for this initiative?

    About Implementation Preferences

  17. Phased rollout or full program deployment?

  18. Any preferred pilot projects?

  19. What level of scheduler involvement do you want (top-down mandate vs collaborative)?

  20. Any other must-haves or constraints I should know?

Step 2 – After receiving answers, write a single cohesive proposal that:

- Opens with the main pain point in the user’s own language.

- Quantifies business impact using their numbers and portfolio value.

- Proposes a P6 enterprise design and consistency framework tailored to their project types and organization.

- Includes: Executive Summary, Current State, Proposed Solution, Implementation Plan and timeline, Resource Requirements, Expected Outcomes, ROI/Business Case, Risk and Objection Mitigation, and Clear Next Steps.

- Addresses each key audience group with specific benefits and responses to anticipated objections.

- Uses a direct, conversational tone, simple language (about 8th-grade level), no em dashes, minimal jargon, clear headings, and bullet points where helpful.

Take a deep breath and work on this problem step-by-step.

  • Company - Google

  • Location - Multiple United States Locations

  • Company - American Hydro

  • Location - United States

  • Company - Metric DCX

  • Location - United States

We have no connection to these jobs or companies. Our goal is simply to help you land the job of your dreams.

MGMT Playbook

Sponsored

MGMT Playbook

Practical management insights straight to your inbox every Wednesday.

Subscribe

This week’s episode we dive into creating a scheduling team. Watch or Listen on Spotify, Apple Podcasts or Youtube.

Thank you for reading.

Check out Micah, Greg and Beyond Deadlines on LinkedIn.

Sign up for our LinkedIn newsletter.

Subscribe to our YouTube Channel.

Listen to the podcast on Spotify or Apple Podcasts. Visit our website.

See you next week,